The short answer (TL;DR)
An AI readiness assessment for a marketing team starts with the work, not the tools. Follow one piece of work from brief to report and note where it waits, gets redone or goes outside the team. Use those notes to decide where AI should help, where a person stays in charge and what baseline you’ll measure against.
In this article
What to remember
- Map one real workflow before choosing any AI tool.
- Waiting time and rework are usually where AI gives time back.
- Tasks with brand, legal or reputational risk keep a person in charge.
- Record how long each stage takes today. Without a baseline, you can’t show that anything improved.
- Readiness is also about people: 41% of employees say they’re apprehensive about AI (McKinsey).
For marketing leaders who have an AI budget and want to know where it should go first.
I’ve spent 25 years in agencies and marketing departments, 15 of them leading teams. The work that stalled rarely stalled for dramatic reasons. It was a brief that kept changing, or an approval that waited for days. That’s where I start any conversation about AI, because those are the hours a tool can actually give back.
The budget, meanwhile, is moving faster than the process. Gartner’s 2026 CMO Spend Survey found that marketing leaders now put an average of 15.3% of their budgets into AI, yet only 30% report mature AI readiness, and 70% say their internal marketing processes aren’t mature enough to implement and scale it (Gartner, May 2026).
What is an AI readiness assessment?
An AI readiness assessment is a short, structured look at how a team works today, used to decide where AI should help first. For a marketing team it covers the workflow (how work moves from brief to report), the people (skills and confidence), the rules (brand, data and review) and the measures you’ll use to know it worked. Tools come last.
McKinsey’s latest State of AI survey shows why the workflow comes first. Nearly three-quarters of the companies getting real financial value from AI say they have fundamentally redesigned workflows around it, compared with about a quarter of everyone else (McKinsey, August 2026).
Tool-first vs workflow-first
| Starting with a tool | Starting with the workflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | A tool someone saw in a demo | One real piece of work, from brief to report |
| What gets faster | One step, usually drafting | The steps where work actually waits |
| Where work piles up | At the next bottleneck, often approvals | Bottlenecks are dealt with as part of the change |
| Risk control | Decided case by case, if at all | Agreed before anyone starts |
| Proof of value | Hard to show without a baseline | Measured against today’s numbers |
A new tool dropped into an old process usually speeds up one step and leaves the rest as it was. The work then piles up at the next bottleneck.
What to map in a marketing workflow
Pick one piece of work your team does often, such as a campaign, a monthly content calendar or a product launch, and follow it from start to finish. Do this with the people who do the work. A map drawn by managers alone tends to show how work is supposed to flow, which is rarely how it flows on a busy Tuesday.
| Stage | What to record | Where AI could help | What a person keeps |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brief | Time to a signed-off brief, rounds of changes | Turning meeting notes into a first draft | Objective, audience, message |
| Concept and copy | Drafting time, revision rounds | First drafts and variations | The final idea and the brand voice |
| Production | Hours per asset, outside spend | Resizing, versions, first cuts | Brand standards and final quality |
| Review and approvals | Waiting time between rounds | Pre-checks against a brand checklist | Sign-off on claims and risk |
| Launch and publishing | Manual steps per launch | Scheduling and formatting | Timing and the last check |
| Reporting | Hours per report | Pulling the data together | What the results mean and what’s next |
Waiting time and rework are usually where the surprises are.
Questions that show where AI fits
Once the map is on the wall, these questions help sort the candidates:
- Where does work wait, and why?
- Which tasks repeat every week with small variations?
- Where does quality slip because people are rushed?
- What work goes outside the team today, and what does that cost in time and money?
- Which tasks carry brand, legal or reputational risk if they go wrong?
The first four usually point to good places to try AI. The last one tells you where a person must stay in the loop and what rules the team will need before anyone starts.
How to run the assessment, step by step
- Choose one workflow that runs every week or month.
- Follow it with the people who do it, and time each stage, waiting included.
- Mark where work gets redone, where it waits and what goes outside the team.
- Flag the steps that carry brand, legal or reputational risk.
- Pick two or three places to try AI first, and name an owner for each.
- Note what has to change in the process before any tool will help (often the approval route).
- Record the baseline: how long each stage takes today.
That last step is easy to skip and hard to recreate afterward. Without it, any claim about time saved is a guess.
Readiness is also about people
A workflow map shows where AI could help. It doesn’t show whether the team is ready to use it. McKinsey’s research on AI in the workplace found that only 1% of leaders describe their companies as mature in AI deployment, and that 41% of employees are more apprehensive about it and will need additional support (McKinsey, January 2025).
So when I map a workflow, I’m also paying attention to who feels confident and who is quietly worried about what changes for them. Both lists matter. The second one decides how the rollout should be paced and how much support people will need.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Mapping the ideal process. Map what happened on the last real campaign, delays included.
- Leaving out the people who do the work. They know where the time goes, and they’ll be the ones using whatever comes next.
- Assessing everything at once. One workflow done well teaches you more than ten done quickly.
- Skipping the baseline. It takes a week to record and is impossible to rebuild later.
Where I can help
This mapping is the first thing I do with a team in a workflow audit, before we talk about tools at all. You come away with a short, prioritized list: where AI belongs in your work, where it doesn’t yet and what to measure. From there, the next steps are usually building AI into the workflow and helping the team use it with confidence.
Final thought
If you do one thing this month, follow a single campaign from brief to report and write down every place it waited. It’s a small exercise, and it tends to change the conversation about which tools you actually need.
Frequently asked questions
What is AI readiness?
For a marketing team, AI readiness means the team understands its own workflow, has agreed on a few places where AI should help, has people trained to use it and has simple rules for brand, data and review. Tools are only one part of it.
How do consultants assess AI readiness in a business?
Approaches differ from firm to firm. With marketing teams, I start by following real work from brief to report, then look at skills, rules and how results will be measured. The goal is a short, prioritized plan the team can start on right away.
How do you assess readiness for AI in marketing content operations?
Follow one piece of content from brief to publication and time each step. Note where it waits, where it gets redone and which steps repeat every week. Those notes usually tell you more than a survey of tools.
Who should be involved in an AI readiness assessment?
The people who do the work, the people who approve it and the leader who owns the budget. Include someone from legal or compliance if the team publishes claims that carry risk. Keep the group small enough to have a real conversation.

About the author
Perla Richa is a marketing and communications leader helping teams build AI into how they work. Based in Montreal.
Sources
- Gartner, 2026 CMO Spend Survey, press release, May 11, 2026. Read on gartner.com
- McKinsey & Company, “The state of AI in 2026: On the road to ROI,” August 25, 2026. Read on mckinsey.com
- McKinsey & Company, “Superagency in the workplace,” January 28, 2025. Read on mckinsey.com
Not sure yet where AI fits in your team?
That’s a good place to start a conversation.



